Comments for Bad Conscience

Comment on On Politics by Dr. H.R. Goetting (@DrHRGoetting)

Dr. H.R. Goetting (@DrHRGoetting) — Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:30:08 +0000

Filthy racism @ US textbook publisher John Wiley & Sons (JW/A @ NYSE) (Hoboken, NJ)‏
Chairman Peter Booth Wiley pwiley@wiley.com uses John Wiley & Sons to sell his Racism. Is he a “sovereign citizen”, an extremist who defies government regulations? Read for yourself!
Chairman Peter Booth Wiley is a worst-case racist who likes to use obscene expressions. He is also promoting race discriminations in an evil way – that is what sociologists refer to as intentional discrimination. His idea of proposing canned edible John Wiley & Sons textbooks for the African university markets will turn into a real can of worms for him.
Listen to Chairman Peter Booth Wiley’s mud slinging, the racist of all things African: “With my great invention of canned edible learning products I have solved the African hunger and illiteracy problems for everyone not suffering from bulimia and learning disorders”. The Chairman’s information leak shows that people in America think it’s cool to be stupid.
Chairman Peter Booth Wiley was sliding off his chair and tried hard to push himself back up again. His racial joke amused him so much that he burst into laughter and whisky sprayed out from his mouth. “I want to bring edible education tools to them Negroes”. Chairman Peter Booth Wiley virulent attack speech is a repulsive, bad American dream come true! John Wiley & Sons itself is an uncivilized and racist assault to the very idea of academic freedom.
Is Chairman Peter Booth Wiley going to run for political office like that other member of the Ku Klux Klan named David Dukes? The First Amendment to the American Constitution covers Chairman Peter Booth Wiley’s hate speech and makes him an honorary Ku Klux Klan member, where such racism flourishes. “I know another one”, he announced with tears of laughter in his eyes. “Do you know the colonial law of the plantations in Africa?” The master-slave interpretations of Chairman Peter Booth Wiley take Africans to a new low point of reference. “Twenty-one on the ass to make the lazy nigger work again” he told for extra credit. After his reflection on race relations in America, Chairman Peter Booth Wiley shrieked and was shaken with laughter. It’s the same old filthy dehumanizing business that has been at the core of John Wiley & Sons all along.
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. might have to recall its contaminated edible canned education books.
I should have gotten a restraining order on the grounds that Chairman Wiley violates California’s antidiscrimination laws: “Selling our products in Africa is like throwing pearls before swine”. Chairman Peter Booth Wiley became more and more bad tempered. “They don’t have the brains of human beings”. He talked himself into a mind-boggling rage. “These dumb black hate mongers”. Chairman Peter Booth Wiley spoke one language, and was especially fluent in a 2nd: racism!
The hell knows why, but Chairman-hypocrite Peter Booth Wiley insists he is not a racist. “I am not one of those people” the Chairman slapped his knee and gurgled with laughter and sent more whisky gurgling down his throat. He will learn the hard lessons of the instantaneous digital world very soon. Chatter on the web makes outrage spread virally faster and hotter across this world than John Wiley & Sons could put a razor-wire fence around it.
I worked for eighteen months at John Wiley & Sons’ San Francisco archive, located in Chairman Peter Booth Wiley’s office.
To write a strange memoir about secrets, I worked for eighteen months at John Wiley & Sons’ San Francisco archive, located in Chairman Peter Booth Wiley’s office. After eighteen months of interviews with Chairman Peter Booth Wiley, the quotes from him were a big pile of unorganized papers in a shoe-box containing only my hand-scribbled notes before I edited and made them ready for publication. I tried to report word by word what I had penciled down during the intimate ‘interviews’. I also played the devil’s advocate by brainstorming and debating the tongue wagging of Chairman Peter Booth Wiley. I gave his words satirical interpretations and used the method of dramatizing and narrating. My sarcastic undertones fall under the protection of the First Amendment. It’s a new kind of investigative journalism, where obsolete rules where thrown out. I use an intermediate standard for publishing, since the quotes from Chairman Peter Booth Wiley do not lend themselves to firm corroboration. Should I check out my deep-throat with U.S. authorities?
As editor I was not only participant in reconstructing the conversations, its perverse drama of unwanted homo-sex and the Chief’s alcoholism, but also commentator of John Wiley & Sons ugly history. It is an opinion-driven investigation that has an interview basis, in which I tried to get answers from Chairman Peter Booth Wiley, who lives in San Francisco / Amerikkka.

Comment on On the Genealogy of Benefit Scrounging by Chris

Chris — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:57:18 +0000

and of those 400,000 vacancies, roughly 1/4 are transient vacancies, that will be taken by people who are already in work, more a shuffling of the pack of the employed rather than vacancies for the unemployed

Comment on On the Genealogy of Benefit Scrounging by DarkestAngel32

DarkestAngel32 — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:49:53 +0000

Currently there are around 400,000 job vacancies. The official unemployment figure is 2.6 million. Plenty of jobs? I hardly think so, and for the record, being on benefits is not fun. Personally, I dont live in luxury (and I can read thankyou) and neither do my children, whom I had while I was working/being supported by a working partner. The problem of individuals who have never worked is minimal. The problem of those who have been out of work for a number of years is minimal. More people in work claim housing benefit and tax credits (which are benefits) as a result of low wages and high cost of living. Therefore when benefit claimants are demonised in sweeping generalisations, it is insulting to those who claim and work, and those who want to work but are unable to find employment. It also insults those who would do anything to be able to work but can’t through disability or caring responsibilities. Benefit rates in this country are extremely low compared to other european countries. I wonder, is there the same hatred of us in other countries?

Comment on Fairness: The Academy vs. the Electorate? by iejqkk

iejqkk — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:22:52 +0000

BkvdBN qrtpfbdslzfr

Comment on Just Boring by vutgpeo

vutgpeo — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:11:31 +0000

5FVp6O eclgggrbefzc

Comment on Some Ways to Think About Democracy by faigdg

faigdg — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:27:29 +0000

LAvvCM wpfzsaefvkxb

Comment on Some Ways to Think About Democracy by rhlioz

rhlioz — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:45:20 +0000

9IDKRi vckavxofqhva

Comment on The Universal Panacea by xbvbpc

xbvbpc — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:35:37 +0000

nnlhmp yeolmekwcckq

Comment on Fairness: The Academy vs. the Electorate? by pwzqopns

pwzqopns — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:15:02 +0000

WWlLGS udqlaazxfwpz

Comment on On the Genealogy of Benefit Scrounging by Chris

Chris — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:55:29 +0000

Well there’s no excuse for not working other than there being around four million people of working age more than there are jobs. No matter the level of wishful thinking involved, Santa isn’t suddenly going to magically make four million jobs turn up out of thin air, and blaming people for not having jobs that management has moved offshore appears to be apportioning blame in entirely the wrong direction.

looking at this in reverse, If an individual is single, with no dependents, would it be considered moral for that person to go for a job in competition with people who have families to support? Would it be a moral action to sacrifice ones employment opportunities so that other more needy people could survive financially?